War Game Simulation: Preparing for a Taiwan Crisis
- George Beitis
- Feb 3, 2024
- 2 min read

In a significant event that underscores the growing geopolitical tensions in the Asia-Pacific region, the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) conducted a thought-provoking exercise. A war game simulation, held in late 2023 and led by Republican Mike Gallagher, envisaged a scenario where China invades Taiwan, a self-governing island claimed by Beijing.
The exercise's primary objective was to assess and prepare for the potential economic, military, and diplomatic fallout of such a conflict. It brought together policymakers, military strategists, and economic experts, reflecting a rare bipartisan focus on the escalating tensions across the Taiwan Strait. The strategic war game simulation portrayed a scenario set in 2027, offering a platform for the committee members to act as senior advisers to a hypothetical U.S. president.
Key Findings:
Military Preparedness: The simulation emphasized the urgency of arming Taiwan and bolstering its defences to deter Chinese aggression. It highlighted the challenges in resupplying Taiwan once a conflict begins and the necessity for the U.S. to clear its existing weapons backlog to the island.
Economic Fallout: A significant insight was the potential economic impact of such a conflict on global markets. The exercise projected that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan could leave world markets in disarray, with implications far beyond the military sphere.
Diplomatic Strategies: The war game underscored the importance of diplomatic manoeuvres, including strengthening alliances with regional partners and reinforcing international norms against unilateral changes in the status quo.
Bipartisan Consensus: Reflecting a rare unity in Washington, the exercise showcased a bipartisan agreement on the need for decisive action. This consensus extends to the belief that the U.S. must enhance its military presence in the region and engage in more profound joint military training.
Global Implications: The scenario played out in the war game extends beyond the U.S.-China dynamic, signalling significant ramifications for international stability, trade, and security.
This simulation is not just a theoretical exercise but a clear indication of the serious considerations being given to the strategic challenges in the Asia-Pacific region. It represents an acknowledgement of the complexities and potential consequences of a conflict over Taiwan, necessitating a multifaceted approach that encompasses military preparedness, economic resilience, and diplomatic finesse.
As tensions continue to simmer in the Taiwan Strait, such simulations and strategic assessments become vital tools for policymakers. They provide a framework for understanding the stakes involved and for developing robust strategies to navigate these turbulent geopolitical waters.



